A time-lapse map of nuclear explosions.
This is long (15 minutes) and starts very slowly, but stick with it, oh my god. I couldn't look away. I had no idea. I'm pretty much of a post-Cold-War generation - the first major news event I remember being aware of was the fall of the Berlin Wall - and I didn't grow up worrying about The Bomb. I feel like I maybe have a new insight into that now.
This is long (15 minutes) and starts very slowly, but stick with it, oh my god. I couldn't look away. I had no idea. I'm pretty much of a post-Cold-War generation - the first major news event I remember being aware of was the fall of the Berlin Wall - and I didn't grow up worrying about The Bomb. I feel like I maybe have a new insight into that now.
no subject
Date: 2012-04-27 01:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-04-27 01:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-04-27 01:52 am (UTC)(The most disturbing bomb-related thing I ever had to view was while writing a paper on the US testing in the Pacific and the quote I needed was a voice-over over an explosion montage -- I probably had to watch that thing thirty times through. But I did grow up a Cold War child -- my parents were super-politically-active, and thus I caught the tail end of it. I never expected to survive to adulthood as a kid -- I really didn't think we were going to make it.)
no subject
Date: 2012-04-27 02:25 am (UTC)My second reaction: Well, that explains a lot about California.
no subject
Date: 2012-04-27 01:27 pm (UTC)I'm sure some of the tests have yielded valuable scientific information, but they can't be cheap... I bet if nuclear bomb physicists had to go through NSF instead of the military, they'd have managed to get their data in a lot fewer trials.
no subject
Date: 2012-04-27 02:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-04-27 03:26 am (UTC)1. I suspect that most Americans - certainly of my generation- don't realize just how many tests were done in New Mexico and how few in the South Pacific. (All the impressive photos are of atmospheric tests.)
2. WTF France?
3. The end was the most interesting, when it summarized all the explosions by country and showed test coverage of the planet. I would suggest starting at 12:00 even more than I would suggest skipping to 1962.
4. In the nuclear age, fourteen test-free years is an eternity. Nuclear proliferation, like Cold Wars, is bad. Test-ban treaties are good.
no subject
Date: 2012-04-27 04:05 am (UTC)Re: 2: I know, right? We had a perfectly workable test ban agreement in place before France decided it would rather test than move its testing site out of Algeria (which was in the process of becoming Not-France at the time.) Cue another
no subject
Date: 2012-04-27 04:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-04-27 04:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-04-27 04:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-04-27 08:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-04-30 01:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-04-27 05:00 am (UTC)And it essentially hasn't. There are still a lot of nations with them, some of whom have enough to pretty much end life on Earth. It's not the arms that have been changed, but the attitude; no brinkmanship and no sabre rattling. But as someone who grew up with nuclear war being a major dread, I have to wonder how easily it would be to slip back into those conditions. Does anyone really believe we've evolved into the Star Trek Glorious Pacifist Future [TM]?
no subject
Date: 2012-04-27 03:17 pm (UTC)