From my new pancake-like perspective, one minor longstanding mystery has been solved. Also I have come to see blinking for the rewarding pastime it is.
Page Summary
saxifrage.livejournal.com - ack?
psocoptera.livejournal.com - Re: ack?
blackholly.livejournal.com - (no subject)
thegraybook.livejournal.com - (no subject)
psocoptera.livejournal.com - (no subject)
psocoptera.livejournal.com - (no subject)
blackholly.livejournal.com - (no subject)
thegraybook.livejournal.com - (no subject)
blackholly.livejournal.com - (no subject)
thegraybook.livejournal.com - it's a quote, doofus
blackholly.livejournal.com - Re: it's a quote, doofus
thegraybook.livejournal.com - Re: it's a quote, doofus
franzeska - Re: ack?
ccommack - (no subject)
allectofromlj - (no subject)
psocoptera.livejournal.com - Re: it's a quote, doofus
tromboneborges.livejournal.com - Re: ack?
psocoptera.livejournal.com - (no subject)
franzeska - Re: ack?
tromboneborges.livejournal.com - Re: ack?
psocoptera.livejournal.com - Re: ack?
tromboneborges.livejournal.com - Re: ack?
psocoptera.livejournal.com - (no subject)
psocoptera.livejournal.com - Re: ack?
tromboneborges.livejournal.com - Re: ack?
psocoptera.livejournal.com - Re: ack?
tromboneborges.livejournal.com - Re: ack?
irilyth - Re: it's a quote, doofus
tromboneborges.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Style: Classic for Refried Tablet by and
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
ack?
Date: 2003-10-29 01:24 pm (UTC)Re: ack?
Date: 2003-10-29 01:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-10-29 01:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-10-29 01:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-10-29 01:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-10-29 01:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-10-29 02:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-10-29 02:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-10-29 02:05 pm (UTC)it's a quote, doofus
Date: 2003-10-29 02:08 pm (UTC)How can you not care about dishing dirt on Josh? I know, for instance, that he brushes his hair once a month and wears hot pink thongs.
Re: it's a quote, doofus
Date: 2003-10-29 02:10 pm (UTC)Re: it's a quote, doofus
Date: 2003-10-29 02:12 pm (UTC)*offers apologies for spam*
;)
Re: ack?
Date: 2003-10-29 02:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-10-29 02:19 pm (UTC)...
...
...
...
...what...the...*heck* is going here??? ::utterly confused::
no subject
Date: 2003-10-29 02:34 pm (UTC)Re: it's a quote, doofus
Date: 2003-10-29 02:37 pm (UTC)Although have been further mindwarped by the thought of Josh in a hot pink thong, meep. I guess it is just one of those days.
Ice weasels are funny. (Pants are also funny, as are things being "dire" (D&D for "real big"). So dire pants are *really* funny, and ice weasels *in* your dire pants is sort of the ultimate hybrid of hilarity...) It was meant as a compliment ::grin::.
Re: ack?
Date: 2003-10-29 02:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-10-29 03:02 pm (UTC)Re: ack?
Date: 2003-10-29 03:17 pm (UTC)sigh
I have no memory.
Re: ack?
Date: 2003-10-29 03:20 pm (UTC)Re: ack?
Date: 2003-10-29 03:24 pm (UTC)Re: ack?
Date: 2003-10-29 03:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-10-29 03:40 pm (UTC)So a fellow Swattie and one of the former members of my D&D campaign has turned out to be the same "Josh" oft-mentioned by Cassie Claire, Draco Trilogy author and generally Known Fandom Person, bringing two heretofore entirely separate pieces of the world into alarming overlap, with resulting Pauli Exclusion Principle effects such as causing my brain to spontaneously implode. All fine and happy and un-bad (except for the other effect that I keep posting to lj instead of transforming this damned plasmid for the fourth time, which, gah, am not thrilled about).
Re: ack?
Date: 2003-10-29 03:49 pm (UTC)(Is there a way to edit comments? I ended up deleting and reposting an edited version.)
I must, however, warn you that if you don't want your last initial trumpeted about for all of the web to read, you're going to have to have some sort of nickname, should I ever need to refer to you again, since I feel that as I am dating a Josh I ought be clear about which Joshes I am talking about. I'm inclined to go with SlashJosh, although hot!pink!thong!Josh, while a bit unwieldy, could be a contender. ::grin:: Or perhaps "Lucan Josh" to go with the Emsariel theme...
Re: ack?
Date: 2003-10-29 03:54 pm (UTC)I do not mind being Slash!Josh. As long as it is not expressed as an imperative statement.
Re: ack?
Date: 2003-10-29 04:20 pm (UTC)Re: ack?
Date: 2003-10-29 04:31 pm (UTC)Re: it's a quote, doofus
Date: 2003-10-29 06:02 pm (UTC)(A hot pink thong? Well, whatever turns you on... :^)
no subject
Date: 2003-10-30 06:48 am (UTC)Apparently I am to be referred to as "Slash!Josh." There are no words. There is hysterical, rueful laughter, of course. But no words, per se.