I feel like it’s also worth noting that a lot of the things that some people were very sure would happen wrt a Chinese Worldcon didn’t. (Which makes me even more dubious about Kevin’s and other people’s “I told you so” posts.)
In particular, if the Chinese gov’t intervened in the Hugos, they seem to have done so only wrt to the nominations process, and only in certain specific ways.
At various times last year, I saw people claiming things like: the entire ballot was going to consist only of works by Chinese authors; the voting for the final winners was going to be completely controlled by the gov’t (possibly by recruiting thousands of people to vote for only the approved finalists); site selection would result in all future Worldcons being in China; etc.
It’s not that I think those fears were completely ridiculous or that those outcomes couldn’t have happened; on the contrary, I think that if the Chinese gov’t cared enough about the Hugos and Worldcon, it could easily have engineered any of those outcomes.
But it didn’t. As far as we know, the process after the finalists were announced was pretty ordinary. If there was interference after that point, it was apparently pretty subtle. Which led me to (with relief) conclude that the central Chinese gov’t really just didn’t particularly care about the Hugos.
So that leads me to questions like:
If the blatant weirdness of the nominations info is in fact due to heavy-handed and incompetent but thorough gov’t interference, then why did the interferers interfere only in that one particular bit of the process?
The possibility of multiple authorities (perhaps at different levels, perhaps not even gov’t) sticking their hands in to try to achieve multiple different (possibly contradictory) effects might explain some of that. But I feel like the straightforward “the central gov’t stepped in and insisted on the outcome that they wanted” conspiracy theory that some people are propounding doesn’t really make sense to me.
no subject
In particular, if the Chinese gov’t intervened in the Hugos, they seem to have done so only wrt to the nominations process, and only in certain specific ways.
At various times last year, I saw people claiming things like: the entire ballot was going to consist only of works by Chinese authors; the voting for the final winners was going to be completely controlled by the gov’t (possibly by recruiting thousands of people to vote for only the approved finalists); site selection would result in all future Worldcons being in China; etc.
It’s not that I think those fears were completely ridiculous or that those outcomes couldn’t have happened; on the contrary, I think that if the Chinese gov’t cared enough about the Hugos and Worldcon, it could easily have engineered any of those outcomes.
But it didn’t. As far as we know, the process after the finalists were announced was pretty ordinary. If there was interference after that point, it was apparently pretty subtle. Which led me to (with relief) conclude that the central Chinese gov’t really just didn’t particularly care about the Hugos.
So that leads me to questions like:
If the blatant weirdness of the nominations info is in fact due to heavy-handed and incompetent but thorough gov’t interference, then why did the interferers interfere only in that one particular bit of the process?
The possibility of multiple authorities (perhaps at different levels, perhaps not even gov’t) sticking their hands in to try to achieve multiple different (possibly contradictory) effects might explain some of that. But I feel like the straightforward “the central gov’t stepped in and insisted on the outcome that they wanted” conspiracy theory that some people are propounding doesn’t really make sense to me.